6 research outputs found

    What influences women’s contraceptive choice? A cross-sectional study from Turkey

    Get PDF
    Objectives: In our study, we tried to investigate the determinants of women’s choices about contraception with the aim of discovering whether or not there is a difference in their preferences before and after consultation with a gynaecologist. Material and methods: A total of 1058 women were enrolled. They were given detailed information regarding contraception and contraceptive methods. Subsequently, a survey which was made of 21 questions was administered. Results: Contraceptive counselling significantly changed the contraceptive choice of women. However, influences from social media and friends, their partners and religious belief affected their contraceptive choices. Significant differences in contraceptive choice were observed when women were categorized according to their marital status, education level, household income, age, and number of children. Conclusions: Although contraceptive counselling influenced Turkish women’s choices, there were still other determinants like social media and input from outside sources such as clerics and husbands, which should be overcome

    Comparison of two different antibiotic regimens for the prophylaxisis of cases with preterm premature rupture of membranes: a randomized clinical trial

    Get PDF
    Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the effect of 1 g ampicillin prophylactic dosage whether it is as effective as the dosage of 2 g to prevent maternal and neonatal morbidity in a randomized manner. Materials and methods: One hundred and fourty eight singleton pregnant women with preterm premature rupture of membranes between 21 and 33 weeks of gestation were followed-up during the study period in our institution. We com­pared the efficacy of two different different dosages of ampicillin. The study population was randomized into 2 groups. In the group 1, 1 g of intravenous ampicillin was given every 6 hours. In the group 2, 2 g of intravenous ampicillin was given every 6 hours. Results: There was no significant difference between groups interms of fetal complications (RDS, icterus, mortality, sepsis, transient tachypnea of newborn and the pneumonia), rate of intensive care unit admission, fetal gender, fever, rate of clinical chorioamnionitis, high white blood cell count and the CRP, rate of cases < 30 weeks (p > 0.05). There was a significant differ­ence between the groups for the rate of previous preterm premature rupture of membranes history, steroid administration and the need for tocolysis (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although antibiotics seems to be innocent, several side effects have been introduced. It is reasonable to use the lowest dosages in shortest period in order to minimize these unwanted effects

    Incisional hernia after ovarian debulking surgery

    Get PDF
    Objectives: The purpose of our study was to explore the incidence and contributing variables of an incisional hernia after debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer. Material and methods: The imaging of patients who underwent debulking surgery with an extended vertical incision was re-evaluated for incisional hernias at one-year follow-up, and their medical records were reviewed. We performed univariate and multivariate analysis to find out the risk factors for an incisional hernia. Results: The overall annual incidence of incisional hernia was 26.7 percent (46 of 172). Univariate analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between age, body mass index (BMI), and the length of the incision and the incidence of an incisional hernia. The only factor identified by multivariate analysis as being independently related with the development of an incisional hernia within a year of the operation was BMI (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.01–1.25, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Incisional hernia rates were high after ovarian cancer surgeries, and BMI was the independent factor significantly linked to hernia formation. To reduce the high ratio of incisional hernia among these group of patients, preventative strategies should be researched and applied

    CLINICOPATHOLOGIC FEATURES OF PROBABLY MALIGNANT ADNEXAL MASSES WITHOUT SIGNS OF ASCITES AND CARCINOMATOSIS

    No full text
    Objective: Our objective was to assess the patients who have probable early stage ovarian cancer

    The impact of mode of delivery on the sexual function of primiparous women: a prospective study.

    No full text
    Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of mode of delivery on the sexual function of women using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)

    Does endometriosis have an effect on the survival of women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer?

    No full text
    Purpose: Synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer is defined as the concurrent presence of ovarian cancer with endometrial cancer. We aimed to evaluate whether there is an effect of endometriosis on progression-free survival and overall survival of women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer. We also compared these findings with the patients having endometrial-only tumors and ovarian-only tumors. Methods: The patients who underwent surgery for endometrioid or clear-cell endometrial-only tumors and/or ovarian-only tumors and synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer between 2005 and 2016 were included in this cohort study. The effect of the presence of endometriosis on progression-free survival and overall survival in these women who met the criteria was determined using statistical methods. Women were also compared regarding their demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics. Results: A total of 176 patients were included in this study. All histology types of tumors located in endometrium or ovary were endometrioid or clear-cell cancer. Endometriosis was present in 62 patients (35.2%), whereas adenomyosis was present in 44 patients (25%). Endometriosis was diagnosed more frequently in women with ovarian-only tumors and synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer than those with endometrial-only tumors (59.2% vs 5.7%, p < 0.001 and 45.7% vs 5.7%, p < 0.001, respectively). The patients with endometriosis showed no significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.70; 95% confidence interval = 0.48-6.03; p = 0.408 and hazard ratio = 1.67; 95% confidence interval = 0.30-9.44; p = 0.562, respectively). The presence of endometriosis was a stronger predictor for progression-free survival and overall survival comparing with the presence of adenomyosis. Conclusion: The women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer should be informed that endometriosis has no detrimental effect on progression-free survival and overall survival
    corecore